Court Restores Labour Party Chairman Abure, Others
Peace may have finally returned to the troubled Labour Party (LP) as Justice Hamza Muazu of the Abuja High Court on Friday ordered the stay of execution on the suspension placed on the embattled National Chairman of the Labour Party, Julius Abure, and other officers.
Others also benefitting from the Court order are the National Organizing Secretary, Mr Clement Ojukwu and National Treasurer, Oluchi Opara, who were initially stopped from parading themselves as LP national officials.
The plaintiffs in the case are Martins Esikpali John; Lucky Shaibu; Isah Zekeri; Omogbai Frank; Abokhaiu Aliu; Ayohkaire Lateef; John Elomah and Dr Ayobami Arabambi.
They had in an ex-parte motion, marked M/7082/2023, sought the removal of Abure and the three other national officers of the party which the judge granted the order of suspension
After listening to arguments from the parties, the judge granted the order for a stay of execution pending the determination of the appeal filed by the defendants.
In an ex-parte motion, marked M/7082/2023, brought before the court by the eight plaintiffs, Justice Muazu had on April 5 issued an interim injunction stopping Abure, Ibrahim and the party’s National Organizing Secretary, Mr Clement Ojukwu and National Treasurer, Oluchi Opara, from parading themselves as national officers of LP.
At Friday’s sitting, the defendants told the court that they have a notice of appeal pending at the Court of Appeal and after many arguments from the parties, the judge granted an order for a stay on the suspension.
Arising from the ex-parte injunction made by Justice Muazu on 5th April 2023, restraining Abure, Ibrahim and two other national officials of the party, the LP’s counsel, Alex Ejesieme (SAN) had on April 20 argued that the Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter.
The Senior lawyer submitted that the matter before the Court bordered on the internal affairs of the Labour Party, adding that criminal allegations made by the plaintiffs in the case, could not be ventilated in an origination summon.
He said the eight plaintiffs that brought the case before the court were not members of the National Executive Council of the party and as such lacked the locus standi to institute the case.
According to Ejesieme, “Our contention is very clear that those criminal allegations cannot be ventilated in an origination summon. The issue of locus standi is there. When you referred to LP’s constitution, the claimants are not members of NEC or the party. They have a duty to present their membership cards to the court which they didn’t.”
While objecting to the preliminary objection raised by the counsel for Abure, counsel for the plaintiffs, Mr George Ibrahim, urged the court to dismiss same.
According to him, the first to fourth defendants had yet to obey the April 5 order of the court as they were still parading themselves as national officers of the LP.
With the ruling of the court on having jurisdiction to hear the case, its order of April 5 subsists. The judge then adjourned until today to hear the substantive case.
Earlier, the plaintiffs had informed the Court, through their counsel, Ogwu Onoja (SAN), that Abure and the three other national officials allegedly forged several documents of the FCT High Court, including receipts, seals and affidavits, to carry out unlawful substitutions in the last general election.
Onoja argued that following their indictment by the police investigation, the four people are to be arraigned in court, adding that warrants for their arrest have already been obtained. – With NAN reports