- Says alleged promoters undergoing investigations
- Over 1000 case files under review, 285 already in court
The Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr Abubakar Malami (SAN), has moved to douse the heat on alleged Boko Haram financiers, declaring that the time is not yet ripe to officially disclose their identities.
He however assured that the Federal government will leave no stone unturned in its resolve to prosecute those sponsoring the terrorist organization also known as ‘Jamā’at Ahl as-Sunnah lid-Da’wah wa’l-Jihād’.
A statement released to newsmen in Abuja on Wednesday said investigations have reached an advanced stage to unravel those behind activities of insurgents and other terrorist groups in the country.
Malami also assured that the Federal Government, would at the appropriate time, disclose their identities through a judicial process that would entail prosecution.
The statement, signed by his media aide, Dr Umar Gwandu, said the Minister, who spoke with journalists in New York at the ongoing 76th session of the United Nations (UN) General Assembly, insisted it was not yet time for holistic disclosures, as not to pre-empt the investigation process.
According to the statement, the Federal Government is committed to ensuring a peaceful and prosperous Nigeria, adding that the public “would be properly and adequately informed about the investigation and prosecution process at the appropriate milestones as they unfold”.
“The position, as it stands, is that investigation has reached advanced stage and the Government will make a statement in that direction in due course. Time is not ripe for holistic disclosures so as not to pre-empt the investigation process. The prime object remains the attainment of peace and security of our dear nation.
“As far as terrorism funding and financing is concerned, we have succeeded in identifying those that are allegedly responsible for funding same and we are blocking the leakages associated with funding while embarking on aggressive investigation that is indeed impacting positively in terms of the fight against terrorism.
“The truth of the matter is that investigation is ongoing and advancing. For the purpose of investigation I would not like to be pre-emptive in terms of making disclosures that will have effect of undermining the successes we are recording. One thing I can tell you for sure is that whatever we do in terms of detention and arrest is indeed backed up by judicial processes.
“We have acquired and obtained legitimate court orders taking into consideration the facts and material proof of evidence presented before the court on account of which the court eventually exercises its discretion in terms of granting orders that we can have the suspects in custody pending the conclusion of the investigation,” Malami stated.
He further disclosed that through the Complex Case Group of the Department of Public Prosecution of the Federation in the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, the Federal Government has reviewed over 1000 Boko Haram Case files, out of which 285 are now before the Federal High Court based on prima facie cases of terrorism against them.
The Justice Minister however explained that; “The delay witnessed in the prosecution process was occasioned by COVID-19 lockdown, Judiciary Staff Union (JUSUN) Strike, and court vacation.”
On mounting public agitations for immediate disclosures of those financing the terrorist groups, Malami said; “Naming and shaming of suspects are not embarked upon as a policy by the Federal Government out of sheer respect the constitutional rights of Nigerians relating to presumption of innocence.
“It is a product of constitutionalism and the law. It is rooted in the law and the names of the suspects will accordingly be made public at the point of judicial arraignment while the shaming remains a consequence of judicial conviction. Trials are judicial processes and not about media sensations.
“Naming and shaming in the Nigerian context must be rooted in constitutionalism. We must strike a balance between the constitutional presumption of innocence and evidential proof of reasonable ground for suspicion in making disclosures associated with terrorism funding and financing.
“Where reasonable grounds are established, suspects must be naturally taken to court at which point their identity must be disclosed and the naming becomes apparent. Shaming, on the other hand, is the product of conviction at which point the public is equally judicially put on noticed.
“In essence naming and shaming within the context of Nigerian law are judicial functions which commence with the arraignment and terminate with convictions. Naming and shaming is not an unguided and unregulated process. It is not like a discarded ship left at the mercy of winds and tides”, the statement maintained.
