Alleges personal, power bloc agenda
BY VICTOR BUORO, ABUJA – Controversy surrounding the ‘invitation’ of Acting Chairman of Economic Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ibrahim Magu, by the Department of State Security (DSS) to appear before a Presidential panel on Monday, July 6, 2020 may have opened another can of worm in the President Muhammadu Buhari-led administration.
And for daring to write the memo (petition) that stirred up Magu’s current travails, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami (SAN) seems to have eaten more than he can chew as forces continue to mass against him over the issue.
Joining the fray on the side of embattled EFCC Boss is a member of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Professor Femi Odekunle, who says AGF Malami does not have any rectitude to accuse Magu of corruption or official misconduct.
He maintained that events in recent past clearly indict Malami and portray him as one lacking in rightness of principle or conduct to effectively tackle issues of corruption in Nigeria.
Professor Odekunle insisted that in the present circumstance, Malami cannot be trusted because he “has not manifested any genuine commitment to the anti-corruption fight.”
Claiming to speak for PACAC, Odekunle also said on moral grounds, “It may not be contestable that Malami has been exploiting his alleged loyalty and closeness to the President for his personal/power bloc agenda.”
The full Statement titled “PRESS RELEASE BY PROFESSOR FEMI ODEKUNLE, MEMBER, PRESIDENTIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGAINST CORRUPTION (PACAC)”, read: “This is a preliminary reaction of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) to the alleged ‘arrest’ of Ibrahim Magu, Acting Chairman the Economic Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Of course, the real information reaching us is that he was only invited to appear before a Panel set up not long ago concerning some alleged memo by Malami, Attorney General and Minister of justice, regarding some alleged malfeasance by Magu, along with nominations for his replacement.
It was just that those sent to invite him for whatever reasons best known to them invited some press along and made it look an arrest. That mischief has been confirmed by some apparent afterthought denial by the DSS that it was not an arrest.
While PACAC has not had a formal meeting on this development, I have discussed with the Chairman and some other members and the following can be considered as PACAC’s preliminary reaction to this development.
1.The alleged originating Malami memo, up to the current “arrest “ seems an outcome of power-play by power blocs in the corridors of power in which Malami appears to be an arrow-head or major agent of a power bloc that is not really interested in, or in support of, Buhari’s anti-corruption fight.
i. One can recall the earlier non-confirmation experience of Magu by the 8th Assembly, orchestrated by a power bloc and supported by the DSS ‘Security’ reports;
ii. One can also note the non-resubmission of Magu for confirmation since May, 2019 despite the apparent willingness of the 9th Assembly to consider it this time around;
iii. Furthermore, one must take cognisance of the alleged memo referred to earlier i.e by Malami concerning alleged corrupt practices by Magu, along with his own nominations for Magu’s replacement; and
iv. Again, we cannot forget Malami’s demand of certain high profile case files from Magu which the latter has been resisting.